Uzi Time!

blam blam

why wood, vs folding stock?

might this be..........KRAZ!?!!1Q

Definetely not. He hates 9mm.

I just want to know who the overgrown sunburned rabbit is on my screen.

Yeah, crack jokes at a guy with his own arsenal...

I was gonna say that, but I refrained myself.

. . .


I was biting my lip when a buddy snapped the pic. . . .

And I dont mind 9mm. When its out of a subgun. . .



Better?





Folder is uncomfortable, wood is much easier to get a good cheekweld on. And that makes it easier to hit what you're aimin at. . . .

I love you Krazny(no homo)

I wish I could afford weapons like that. Unfortunately I've just got my AK47(Romanian) and my Mossberg 500 to tide me over for now . Excluding of course the other weapons I shoot from time to time(.50 cals, M240s, M249s, M9s, M4s, etc.), but those aren't really that fun to shoot. Except for the .50 cal of course .

A buddy of mine does have a small collection of his own that he lets me shoot every now and then when I get a chance on leave.

Phoenix!

How ya been man! Stayin safe and outta Haji's sights? How long ya back for?

As an additional note, fitting an M14 rear sight SUCKS ASS.

Especially when my waterstone A.) Loads up in 2-3 passes, and B.) breaks in half when I tried to clean it. . . . .

Been doin alright Kraz,

Been back since... late April I think. Don't know how much longer until I deploy again, most of the rumors goin around say we're going to Trashghanistan in March to do some shake and bake.

I would love to shoot M249. I mean a machine gun with no recoil must be fun.

A machine gun with no recoil? Johnathon, you card!

Kraz, have I shown you this?

Hot, A TT-33 in the hand of a gimp

smokes... I could sit on you and kill you
weapons need to be in the hands of people who can handle them

Those gloves DOES look like something from a gimp suit.. But who knows, he's russian

j/k

oh lawd... why do you have to make everything awkward Smokey?
you sick SOB.

... they just get better grip

It wouldn't be me if I didn't make an average situation an awkward one.

I shot one this summer. You are definitely wrong about the no recoil bit.

But it should kick less than a 5.56 assault rifle, right? And yes, I'm basing this on ArmA.

why would it? It's a pretty big gun.

More weight = less recoil
More forward power = more recoil

M-249 recoil < M-16 recoil

UNLESS ... the M-16 is better designed to compensate for recoil which I don't see as being logical.

It fires this...

tiny bullet.

Sort of. You've got the right idea, but but not all the contributing factors and variables.

Recoil is based on the size and power of the round being fired, the weight of the gun, barrel length, and any muzzle devices fitted.


FELT recoil is a product of the round, firearm shape/layout, muzzledevice, barrel length, and any reciprocating mass inside the weapon.

The M249 to me feels to have more recoil than an M-16 because of the greater reciprocating mass size and the stock layout.

You can handle it in the shoulder while standing, lets say that.

Well yea.

But I can also handle a 50 fired offhand. . . .

Never said you were gonna be able to hit anything, but then again that's what 200rnd belts are good for .

Let's say you're standing while holding M16A3 with 100 drum mag in one hand and M249 in another. Which one would you be able to have better grouping with?